He's practically autistic with his aspergers I reckon, so make some small allowances for his obnoxiousness.
Witness My Fury
JoinedPosts by Witness My Fury
-
96
1874, 1914 and 1943
by TD ina persistent meme that floats around on jw related internet forums holds that christ's second coming was moved forward 40 years (i.e.
from 1874 to 1914) in the year 1943.
(this appears to be based primarily on a statment in the book god's kingdom of a thousand years has approached on page 209 and to a lesser degree, a footnote at the bottom of page 133 of the publication jehovah's witnesses - proclaimers of god's kingdom.).
-
-
-
96
1874, 1914 and 1943
by TD ina persistent meme that floats around on jw related internet forums holds that christ's second coming was moved forward 40 years (i.e.
from 1874 to 1914) in the year 1943.
(this appears to be based primarily on a statment in the book god's kingdom of a thousand years has approached on page 209 and to a lesser degree, a footnote at the bottom of page 133 of the publication jehovah's witnesses - proclaimers of god's kingdom.).
-
-
Witness My Fury
OBVES you have clearly been inserting your medication anally instead of orally, which is why they are having no effect.
Please correct this behaviour anomally asap so the members of this forum can have some peace from your numerological verbal diarrhea.
-
62
On A Scale Of 1 to 10 How Much Knowledge Does A Jehovah's Witness Have About Their Religion?
by minimus inyears (many decades) ago, most jws knew what their religion taught.
they could go toe to toe with a minister or priest and make some good points.. i believe today's witness knows little about most of the convoluted teachings and revisions of the "truth".
yesteryear's witnesses got a 9/10.
-
-
Witness My Fury
I'd give it a 2.
-
96
1874, 1914 and 1943
by TD ina persistent meme that floats around on jw related internet forums holds that christ's second coming was moved forward 40 years (i.e.
from 1874 to 1914) in the year 1943.
(this appears to be based primarily on a statment in the book god's kingdom of a thousand years has approached on page 209 and to a lesser degree, a footnote at the bottom of page 133 of the publication jehovah's witnesses - proclaimers of god's kingdom.).
-
-
Witness My Fury
I rest my case...
-
-
-
Witness My Fury
I agree, if FADING is your goal then you do NOT want to draw undue attention to yourself. Just tell them you don't want to be an MS anymore, get deleted (they will announce it) and take it like a man. Then you can start your fade proper.
-
-
-
Witness My Fury
OK, do you want to be "deleted" by them, or make the move yourself and just tell them you want to stop being one?
Just tell them, don't ASK, would be my suggestion.
-
-
-
Witness My Fury
Email are printable hardcopy as i'm sure you know.
If it backfires (which i think it will) then you can shrug it off as "having a bad day" or whatever. But basically it will likely be seen by the elders as an ambitious but overlooked MS getting huffy about not having recognition / priviledges or having been made an elder.
They will also want to know how you have access to the Flock book.
Just sayin'.
-
13
Science and religion: God didn't make man; man made gods
by whereami inscience and religion: god didn't make man; man made godsop-edin recent years scientists specializing in the mind have begun to unravel religion's "dna.
"july 18, 2011|by j. anderson thomson and clare aukoferbefore john lennon imagined "living life in peace," he conjured "no heaven ... / no hell below us .../ and no religion too.".
no religion: what was lennon summoning?
-
-
Witness My Fury
I think we have a new troll. 17 posts of know it all sarcasm is not the way to enter a forum unless of course you have "issues" and zero social skills.
-
44
i think i might return to the WTS
by dm6 inman im so drained right now and tired i cant say a whole lot.. but you know, i was thinking about going back to them and just to see a bit more about it all.. i dont know to be very honest with you if its thr right thing to do or not on a personal level.. .
i guess i need to mull things over.. .
any suggestions from previous jw's would be awesome for me.
-
-
Witness My Fury
What if they are RIGHT? Wouldn't it be FANTASTIC! After all, who doesn't want to live forever?...
As someone who has studied for a year these will be questions and points you have not been able to thrash out fully. So you likely have unfinished business in your mind and this is unsettling for you.
Even born ins like me who have spent their whole lives believing the JWs were the only true religion and has THE TRUTH, who have since found the errors, the lies, the deliberate suppression of facts that expose the WTS for what it is, ...just another MIND CONTROL CULT, ....even we at times STILL have these very same thoughts from time to time. What if..., maybe, ...
A cool analysis of the facts is the only way to know. For me it is 607 - 1914. It's bunk and cannot be proved true.
Only a careful study of the facts will reveal something to be TRUTH.
-
22
Is the Watchtower stubbornly holding onto the 70 year exile figure within the Old Testament?
by sabastious ini read outlaw's post about how he has watched people make an online career out of debating for and against arguments regarding 607 and 586 being the date of jerusalem's fall.
he's right that this has happened and it's had the nasty side effect of "mudding up the waters" so-to-speak in regards to anyone wishing to glean wisdom from these debates.. i am not a historian and when posts start getting overtly historical my reading of them seems to slow down and i find myself having to reread posts.. i am going to try to simply state each argument to see if i have put it together (correct me if i am wrong):.
the watchtower says that they default to the bible's figure of 70 years of jewish exile which is used more than once in the old testament.
-
-
Witness My Fury
Just don't mention 1914 is the same thread as one discussing 607 or old egg gets all huffy about it for some reason. ...oh that's right, ...it's embarrassing.